I'm a total Sci-Fi fanatic. Most of the sci-fi-post-apocalyptic movies or books that come out get me all jazzed up. I'm fascinated with the concept of how humanity survives when the existing structures previously depended upon on are no longer dependable. In some ways this is how I lean into "being the church". How can the western body of Christ survive the impending collapse? How will the mission of the church survive the future?
Missional Individualism
Cultivating a missional
perspective is one of the most important recalibrations that a church can
make for the future. I am greatly encouraged by this
move, but I’ve observed that when a church “goes missional” often they make a fundamental
misstep that I believe fractures the longevity of missional momentum. Innocently many churches begin
to preach, teach and stir up their congregants to live missionally but often it
is anchored in and fueled by individualism.
Typically the burden falls on individuals to get motivated
enough by this new theology. High
emphasis is placed on “me” to use “my” capacities to be missional. Churches hand out 21 helpful hints for “how
to be missional” to their attendees. I
love helpful hints but in many ways this mode places emphasis on an insidious
drive embedded in Western culture: individual productivity. Being missional can easily become a new
collection of readily accessible methods in being productive. I’m convinced a
missional life cannot be sustained individually.
Missional Individualism
For
those
of us born and bred in the good ole U.S-of-A we approach things with a
hyper individualistic orientation. We are weaned on the idea
of autonomy, when it comes to our ability to climb the spiritual
ladder. We naturally envision ourselves "taking on" or "collapsing under" whatever
spiritual challenged is laid out before us. This is not the imagination of the New Testament family. This is not the mechanism for missional
traction.
This individualistic framework threatens the future of the Missional movement. It threatens the gospel's impulse
in a real-time place and neighborhood. A
paradigm shift must take place.
The Missional Pod
After Christendom is in ashes, our primary witness will be the spaces we create for humans to become more fully human. The ground floor of missional mobility is in the cultivation of community. Sustaining community is multiplied in difficulty compared to creating missional outlets and I think that's why it has become the church's Achilles Heel. I detect that what currently is titled community are often task teams, affinity groups and sanitary programs with a cause. Sure, there is a level of gathering that happens in these groups but they often do not operate like covenant households. Mission finds its endurance in the ongoing formation of the expanse of community. Community is the "pod" that carries mission into the future.
After Christendom is in ashes, our primary witness will be the spaces we create for humans to become more fully human. The ground floor of missional mobility is in the cultivation of community. Sustaining community is multiplied in difficulty compared to creating missional outlets and I think that's why it has become the church's Achilles Heel. I detect that what currently is titled community are often task teams, affinity groups and sanitary programs with a cause. Sure, there is a level of gathering that happens in these groups but they often do not operate like covenant households. Mission finds its endurance in the ongoing formation of the expanse of community. Community is the "pod" that carries mission into the future.
Irritation of Incarnation
Honestly, there is an irritation in incarnation. Community is the garden space where dirt gets underneath our fingernails, as we learn how to love well. It is the great exposure of those inner inclinations towards “selfish ambition and vain conceit”. Community is more than “belonging” it is about “becoming” and meeting the best and worst in ourselves. It is a profound instrument that acts like a scalpel and warm cup of tea at the same time. In our commitment to a together-life we exercise muscles that we want to avoid using, that make us more nimble for the long haul of missional living. This is where I see the gears locking up in the missional conversation. Neutralization takes places in our missional endeavors when community is an addendum or afterthought.
Honestly, there is an irritation in incarnation. Community is the garden space where dirt gets underneath our fingernails, as we learn how to love well. It is the great exposure of those inner inclinations towards “selfish ambition and vain conceit”. Community is more than “belonging” it is about “becoming” and meeting the best and worst in ourselves. It is a profound instrument that acts like a scalpel and warm cup of tea at the same time. In our commitment to a together-life we exercise muscles that we want to avoid using, that make us more nimble for the long haul of missional living. This is where I see the gears locking up in the missional conversation. Neutralization takes places in our missional endeavors when community is an addendum or afterthought.
For the sake of God’s
mission in the world, we need to engage in the physical and the particular rather than being
abstract when it comes to the scaffolding of community, The future of the
church is dependent on the agronomy of open-but-bounded spaces for the curious to observe the life of the Gospel. The preserving of visible households where
ordinary people are struggling forward to maintain emotional habits, good
attitudes and long-term attentiveness is mission imperative.
Getting Particular
Here are two basic but uncomfortable rhythms that we disciple in those coming out of the fog of individualism and into the light of community. The intention is always to move past the rhetoric of community and into real reorientation. Both of these following rhythms are compelled by the incarnation of God in Jesus.
Here are two basic but uncomfortable rhythms that we disciple in those coming out of the fog of individualism and into the light of community. The intention is always to move past the rhetoric of community and into real reorientation. Both of these following rhythms are compelled by the incarnation of God in Jesus.
1. Availability
We purpose to move from our place of security and separation to overlap
our lives. We make ourselves available through regular shared meals, babysitting each other’s kids, working on
each other’s house projects, shopping together, reading together, enjoying
holidays together, cooking together and even moving closer to one another. This takes time, time, time to massage into our DNA. This inhabiting-ethos must become intentional. Naturally when we think of "freedom" we associate it with
more space for independance and more personal rights. However for the early New Testament faith communities, freedom was the fresh possibility to attach to one another beyond prescribed socio-political-ethnic identifications.
2. Vulnerability
We purpose to incrementally present ourselves as we are, “limited, afraid, insecure, angry and weak”. From my
experience this is the hardest risk to encourage people to take. We are so prone to protection,
posing and powering-up. I promise, at some point you will get hurt,
offended and disappointed. For the sake of God's mission, we need relational glue that is sticky enough to hold us
together when our expectations are not met. In the
diagnostics of community, this work of vulnerability often collides with two
hidden impulses: inadequacy and cynicism.
Both inadequacy and cynicism whisper in our mind's voice to "hold back", "keep a
distance", "weigh your other options", "be suspicious" and "duck out at the first
sign of conflict". We cannot genuinely
bind with others without the value of vulnerability between us.
These two practices assemble a
frame for authentic mission in our neighborhoods. Often this construction takes place on the margins of Christianity but I have deep hope that an embodied
relational King-Jesus community will be the new apologetic in our sci-fi-post-apocalyptic civilization. Let's not succumb to the narrative of
individualism even in the championing of mission. Lets not sweep the inconvenience and labor of community
under the carpet anymore.
Interested in the future of the Gospel in mission?
Check out the Missio Alliance Conference
Excellent post Dan. Read a few others - well thought out - been appreciating your tweets as well. I wish I could spend some time and thoughtfully engage but to be brief - another uncomfortably rhythm (or very connected to your second point) is understanding the reward system in a missional context is very different from a non-missional.
ReplyDeleteKeep writing and sharing - thank you.
Tim, thanks. We've been talking about the issue of "returns" in our context. I have found that many who have partnered with our church on the ground have certain expectations on what kind of returns they will receive. Maybe this is what you're talking about with "rewards".
ReplyDeleteAnyhow, thanks for the comment. Peace.
I agree that "life lived together" is the fundamental substrate of the missional church, but I also think the building the Kingdom together requires task teams and causes. To approach the world in a valuable way, we'll need affinity groups and task teams.
ReplyDeleteIn fact, the building of causes together can be the glue that inspires community. Beforehand, people ask, "why?"
I hear what your saying but I actually think affinity groups are a modern construct that essentially separate us into groups of "likeness". I don't see "affinity" as what rally's the New Testament church. Actually if you get down to it there was very little felt affinity between "Jew, Gentile, Male, female, slave and free". I find affinity very fickle and unsustainable long term. We must find ways to build spiritual oikos without segregating into affinity groups. Affinity appeals to our self oriented passions and preferences.
ReplyDeleteI've been at this long enough that I have not seen "cause" driven groups maintain spiritual households long term. They might have some short term effect on a certain justice issue but that is not a strong enough glue to cause them to create shared-life.
I think "causes" and "affinities" flow out of the marinading space of covenant community.
thanks for the push back.
I don't disagree with you. In fact, I agree, deeply. You're describing the church itself.
DeleteAllow me to speak from my own experience.
I am an organizer for missional projects within the church. The projects that I organize that can break down boundaries within churches like Jew or Greek and help churches find a common Kingdom goal. By working together on a common task like this ( http://quixote.org/freshstops ) we find that, if the spiritual oikos is lacking we establish one together.
Through embodying/incarnating the Kingdom, we learn what it means to be an oikos together. Sub-groups within that organize projects together are part of discipleship and are what it means to be church.
I would be willing to bet that when the Acts church set up the food distribution for the widows they formed a task force to get it done.
Yes. I think that groups outside the context of church can break down. I've seen this, in the Occupy movement. When the cause peters out, so does the group. If the work feels fruitless, they move on. Because it doesn't sustain them. It's why I'm a church organizer rather than an activist.
But in my experience, a shared project in the context of a spiritual oikos, can strengthen that oikos.
How's that?
I very much enjoyed this post because it's clearly written from your experiences.
Hey Dan, my name is Erich Schindler, and I'm a long-term missionary in Taiwan. My wife and I are currently starting a missional community here among our local working-class friends (more info on crossing7.com/reachtaiwan). I've been following you on Twitter for a while, and really enjoy your tweets / posts.
ReplyDeleteThis particular article was helpful for me mainly because of its practical bent. I read a ton of material on living missionally, but have found that only a fraction of it is truly useful to practitioners like myself. So thanks for not leaving things at the theory level, but passing on practical advice with your good pointers on "Availability" and "Vulnerability.
You mentioned that you're a sci-fi fan. I'm currently reading "Small Gods" by Terry Pratchett, and finding it to be an incisive (not to mention hilarious) reflection on some aspects of the Christendom church. It reminds me a lot of McLaren's "New Kind of Christian" or "Sophie's World." So in case you haven't read it yet, I highly recommend it.
Lastly, just thought I'd point out some spelling mistakes in your article and comments (kind of OCD of me, I know). "churches Achilles Heel" -> "church's Achilles Heel" "your saying" -> "you're saying" "rally's" -> "rallies"
Blessings,
Erich
Hi Erich,
ReplyDeleteI love hearing about others pioneering communities on mission internationally. I'll pray for you (for real) today.
It's always difficult to narrow down to the practical in a short blog post. I usually leave the practicality for live sessions/interactions. Thanks for the encouragement.
I will also check out that book suggestion.
Thanks for the spelling/grammar help for a dyslexic dude, much appreciated.
Peace.